Anand-Vembar, Shaakya and Keogh, Brian and Higgins, Agnes and Sheaf, Greg and Kartalova-O'Doherty, Yulia and Longe, Olivia and Staines, Lorna and McEvoy, David and Gallant, Allyson J and Wilson, Caroline and Ryan, Leona and FitzGerald, Christine and Nic Aodha, Caoimhe and Ryan, Chelsea and Doody, Michelle and Horkan, Nikki and Hanney, Nora and Breen, Oisín and Thomas, Robyn and Watters, Sarah and Doyle, Louise and Cotter, David and Darker, Catherine D and Cannon, Mary and Lyne, John and McDonald, Colm and Healy, Colm and Donohue, Gary and Burke, Sarah and O'Connor, Karen and Mongan, David and Murphy, Rebecca and O'Keeffe, Donal (2026) Content, implementation, and evaluation of capacity-strengthening initiatives for public and patient involvement in mental health research: a scoping review protocol informed by implementation science. HRB Open Research, 8, 123. https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.14287.2.
External website: https://hrbopenresearch.org/articles/8-123
BACKGROUND: Public and Patient Involvement (PPI) in mental health research is increasingly recognised as a moral and ethical imperative, necessary to increase the relevance and effectiveness of translation of research findings. Despite policy mandates and growing evidence of its benefits, PPI implementation in mental health research remains inconsistent. Little attention has been given to the state of scientific knowledge on PPI capacity strengthening in mental health research that can support more meaningful implementation. The aims of this scoping review are to: describe the content, implementation process, and theoretical underpinnings of PPI capacity-strengthening initiatives in mental health research; identify quantitative outcome measures and outcomes used to evaluate the initiatives' impact on PPI contributors, research processes, and policy; and map barriers and enablers to the initiatives' implementation.
METHODS: This scoping review will follow JBI and PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Sources will include peer-reviewed articles, grey literature, and organisational materials describing training or skill-building initiatives for adult PPI contributors in mental health research. Searches will be conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL, supplemented by hand-searching, targeted internet searches, and stakeholder consultation. Data extraction will capture descriptive details, initiative content, outcomes, and contextual factors, with barriers and enablers categorised according to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) domains.
CONCLUSION: This review will provide the first comprehensive synthesis of capacity-strengthening initiatives for PPI contributors in mental health research. Findings will inform the development of a co-designed blueprint for capacity-strengthening for PPI contributors, and progress broader efforts to embed lived experience expertise and general public perspectives equitably within mental health research systems.
J Health care, prevention, harm reduction and treatment > Health services, substance use research
L Social psychology and related concepts > Participation / involvement / engagement / co-production
R Research > Research organization and management
R Research > Research and evaluation method
T Demographic characteristics > Person who uses substances (user / experience)
VA Geographic area > International
Repository Staff Only: item control page