Snooks, Helen A and Jones, Jenna K and Bell, Fiona B and Benger, Jonathon R and Black, Sarah L and Dixon, Simon and Edwards, Adrian and Emery, Helena and Evans, Bridie A and Fuller, Gordon W and Goodacre, Steve and Hoskins, Rebecca and Hughes, Jane and John, Ann and Johnston, Sasha and Jones, Matthew B and Moore, Chris R and Parab, Rakshita and Pilbery, Richard and Sampson, Fiona C and Watkins, Alan (2024) Take-home naloxone administered in emergency settings: feasibility of intervention implementation in a cluster randomized trial. BMC Emergency Medicine, 24, (1), 155. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01061-3.
External website: https://bmcemergmed.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....
BACKGROUND Opioids kill more people than any other class of drug. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist which can be distributed in kits for peer administration. We assessed the feasibility of implementing a Take-home Naloxone (THN) intervention in emergency settings, as part of designing a definitive randomised controlled trial (RCT).
METHODS We undertook a clustered RCT on sites pairing UK Emergency Departments (ED) and ambulance services. At intervention sites, we recruited emergency healthcare practitioners to supply THN to patients presenting with opioid overdose or related condition, with recruitment across 2019-2021. We assessed feasibility of intervention implementation against four predetermined progression criteria covering site sign up and staff training; identification of eligible patients; issue of THN kits and Serious Adverse Events.
RESULTS At two intervention sites, randomly selected from 4, 299/687 (43.5%) clinical staff were trained (ED1 = 107, AS1 = 121, ED2 = 25, AS2 = 46). Sixty THN kits were supplied to eligible patients (21.7%) (n: ED1 = 36, AS1 = 4, ED2 = 16, AS2 = 4). Across sites, kits were not issued to eligible patients on a further 164 occasions, with reasons reported including: staff forgot (n = 136), staff too busy (n = 15), and suspected intentional overdose (n = 3), no kit available (n = 2), already given by drugs nurse (n = 4), other (n = 4). Staff recorded 626 other patients as ineligible but considered for inclusion, with reasons listed as: patient admitted to hospital (n = 194), patient absconded (n = 161) already recruited (n = 64), uncooperative or abusive (n = 55), staff not trained (n = 43), reduced consciousness level (n = 41), lack of capacity (n = 35), patient in custody (n = 21), other (n = 12). No adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSION Staff and patient recruitment were low and varied widely by site. This feasibility study did not meet progression criteria; a fully powered RCT is not planned.
TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN13232859 (Registered 16/02/2018).
B Substances > Opioids (opiates) > Opioid product > Naloxone
G Health and disease > Substance use disorder (addiction) > Drug use disorder
HJ Treatment or recovery method > Substance disorder treatment method
J Health care, prevention, harm reduction and treatment > Health care programme, service or facility
J Health care, prevention, harm reduction and treatment > Health care programme, service or facility > Hospital
T Demographic characteristics > Nurse / Midwife
VA Geographic area > Europe > United Kingdom
Repository Staff Only: item control page