Home > What works for whom, how and why in mental health education for undergraduate health profession students? A realist synthesis protocol.

McCormack, Zoe and Kerr, Aisling and Simpson, Andrew and Keating, Dolores and Strawbridge, Judith (2024) What works for whom, how and why in mental health education for undergraduate health profession students? A realist synthesis protocol. BMJ Open, 14, (3), e078130. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078130.

External website: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/14/3/e078130

INTRODUCTION: It has been shown that mental health education can support positive attitudes of health profession students towards people with mental health challenges, which supports them to provide optimal healthcare to this group. There are many different approaches to designing and delivering mental health education to health profession students. Each has their own advantages and disadvantages, and often mental health education programmes incorporate a multimodal approach in order to reap the benefits of a variety of teaching and learning approaches. The aim of this study is to understand the current landscape of teaching and learning approaches to mental health education for undergraduate health profession students. We will examine the features of successful outcomes for health profession students for: Learning environment. Knowledge development and retention. Confidence.

MOTIVATION: Preparedness for professional practice.

METHODS: For this, a realist synthesis has been chosen in order to review the literature. Realist synthesis lends itself to the review of complex interventions such as mental health education for undergraduate health profession curricula because it seeks to uncover the range of different mechanisms and context configurations that produce different outcomes. Health profession education and education practice, in general, is complex. A patient and public involvement (PPI) group is involved throughout this study and includes undergraduate health profession students, and members of the St John of Gods Hospital Consumers and Carers Council who are involved at every stage of the research. This study will engage with a stakeholder group who will support the refining of the programme theory.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been sought and approved by Royal College of Surgeons, Ireland Ethical Committee (REC number: 212622783). We will aim to write up and publish the full synthesis as a journal article. We will also discuss ways of dissemination outside of academia with our PPI group.


Repository Staff Only: item control page