Home > Diagnostic criteria for identifying individuals at high risk of progression from mild or moderate to severe alcohol use disorder.

Miller, Alex P and Kuo, Sally I-Chun and Johnson, Emma C and Tillman, Rebecca and Brislin, Sarah J and Dick, Danielle M and Kamarajan, Chella and Kinreich, Sivan and Kramer, John and McCutcheon, Vivia V and Plawecki, Martin H and Porjesz, Bernice and Schuckit, Marc A and Salvatore, Jessica E and Edenberg, Howard J and Bucholz, Kathleen K and Meyers, Jaquelyn L and Agrawal, Arpana (2023) Diagnostic criteria for identifying individuals at high risk of progression from mild or moderate to severe alcohol use disorder. JAMA Network Open, 6, (10), e2337192. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37192.

External website: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/f...

IMPORTANCE Current Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (Fifth Edition) (DSM-5) diagnoses of substance use disorders rely on criterion count-based approaches, disregarding severity grading indexed by individual criteria.

OBJECTIVE To examine correlates of alcohol use disorder (AUD) across count-based severity groups (ie, mild, moderate, mild-to-moderate, severe), identify specific diagnostic criteria indicative of greater severity, and evaluate whether specific criteria within mild-to-moderate AUD differentiate across relevant correlates and manifest in greater hazards of severe AUD development.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cohort study involved 2 cohorts from the family-based Collaborative Study on the Genetics of Alcoholism (COGA) with 7 sites across the United States: cross-sectional (assessed 1991-2005) and longitudinal (assessed 2004-2019). Statistical analyses were conducted from December 2022 to June 2023.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Sociodemographic, alcohol-related, psychiatric comorbidity, brain electroencephalography (EEG), and AUD polygenic score measures as correlates of DSM-5 AUD levels (ie, mild, moderate, severe) and criterion severity-defined mild-to-moderate AUD diagnostic groups (ie, low-risk vs high-risk mild-to-moderate).

RESULTS A total of 13 110 individuals from the cross-sectional COGA cohort (mean [SD] age, 37.8 [14.2] years) and 2818 individuals from the longitudinal COGA cohort (mean baseline [SD] age, 16.1 [3.2] years) were included. Associations with alcohol-related, psychiatric, EEG, and AUD polygenic score measures reinforced the role of increasing criterion counts as indexing severity. Yet within mild-to-moderate AUD (2-5 criteria), the presence of specific high-risk criteria (eg, withdrawal) identified a group reporting heavier drinking and greater psychiatric comorbidity even after accounting for criterion count differences. In longitudinal analyses, prior mild-to-moderate AUD characterized by endorsement of at least 1 high-risk criterion was associated with more accelerated progression to severe AUD (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 11.62; 95% CI, 7.54-17.92) compared with prior mild-to-moderate AUD without endorsement of high-risk criteria (aHR, 5.64; 95% CI, 3.28-9.70), independent of criterion count.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this cohort study of a combined 15 928 individuals, findings suggested that simple count-based AUD diagnostic approaches to estimating severe AUD vulnerability, which ignore heterogeneity among criteria, may be improved by emphasizing specific high-risk criteria. Such emphasis may allow better focus on individuals at the greatest risk and improve understanding of the development of AUD.

Item Type
Publication Type
International, Open Access, Article
Drug Type
Intervention Type
Harm reduction
Identification #
American Medical Association

Repository Staff Only: item control page