Home > Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study.

Verdejo-Garcia, Antonio and Rezapour, Tara and Giddens, Emily and Khojasteh Zonoozi, Arash and Rafei, Parnian and Berry, Jamie and Caracuel, Alfonso and Copersino, Marc L and Field, Matt and Garland, Eric L and Lorenzetti, Valentina and Malloy-Diniz, Leandro and Manning, Victoria and Marceau, Ely M and Pennington, David L and Strickland, Justin C and Wiers, Reinout and Fairhead, Rahia and Anderson, Alexandra and Bell, Morris and Boendermaker, Wouter J and Brooks, Samantha and Bruno, Raimondo and Campanella, Salvatore and Cousijn, Janna and Cox, W Miles and Dean, Andrew C and Ersche, Karen D and Franken, Ingmar and Froeliger, Brett and Gamito, Pedro and Gladwin, Thomas E and Goncalves, Priscila D and Houben, Katrijn and Jacobus, Joanna and Jones, Andrew and Kaag, Anne M and Lindenmeyer, Johannes and McGrath, Elly and Nardo, Talia and Oliveira, Jorge and Pennington, Charlotte R and Perrykkad, Kelsey and Piercy, Hugh and Rupp, Claudia I and Schulte, Mieke H J and Squeglia, Lindsay M and Staiger, Petra and Stein, Dan J and Stein, Jeff and Stein, Maria and Stoops, William W and Sweeney, Mary and Witkiewitz, Katie and Woods, Steven P and Yi, Richard and Zhao, Min and Ekhtiari, Hamed (2023) Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study. Addiction, 118, (5), doi: 10.1111/add.16109.

External website: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.16...

AIMS: Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with cognitive deficits that are not always addressed in current treatments, and this hampers recovery. Cognitive training and remediation interventions are well suited to fill the gap for managing cognitive deficits in SUD. We aimed to reach consensus on recommendations for developing and applying these interventions.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: We used a Delphi approach with two sequential phases: survey development and iterative surveying of experts. This was an on-line study. During survey development, we engaged a group of 15 experts from a working group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (Steering Committee). During the surveying process, we engaged a larger pool of experts (n = 54) identified via recommendations from the Steering Committee and a systematic review.

MEASUREMENTS: Survey with 67 items covering four key areas of intervention development: targets, intervention approaches, active ingredients and modes of delivery.

FINDINGS: Across two iterative rounds (98% retention rate), the experts reached a consensus on 50 items including: (i) implicit biases, positive affect, arousal, executive functions and social processing as key targets of interventions; (ii) cognitive bias modification, contingency management, emotion regulation training and cognitive remediation as preferred approaches; (iii) practice, feedback, difficulty-titration, bias modification, goal-setting, strategy learning and meta-awareness as active ingredients; and (iv) both addiction treatment work-force and specialized neuropsychologists facilitating delivery, together with novel digital-based delivery modalities.

CONCLUSIONS: Expert recommendations on cognitive training and remediation for substance use disorders highlight the relevance of targeting implicit biases, reward, emotion regulation and higher-order cognitive skills via well-validated intervention approaches qualified with mechanistic techniques and flexible delivery options.


Item Type
Article
Publication Type
International, Open Access, Article
Drug Type
All substances
Intervention Type
Treatment method, Psychosocial treatment method
Date
2023
Identification #
doi: 10.1111/add.16109
Publisher
Wiley
Volume
118
Number
5
EndNote

Repository Staff Only: item control page