Home > Characterising differences between self-reported and wastewater-identified drug use at two consecutive years of an Australian music festival.

Puljević, Cheneal and Tscharke, Benjamin and Wessel, Ellen Leslie and Francis, Cameron and Verhagen, Rory and O'Brien, Jake W and Bade, Richard and Nadarajan, Dhayaalini and Measham, Fiona and Stowe, M J and Piatkowski, Timothy and Ferris, Jason and Page, Robert and Hiley, Sarah and Eassey, Christopher and McKinnon, Ginny and Sinclair, Genevieve and Blatchford, Emily and Engel, Liam and Norvill, Alice and Barratt, Monica J (2024) Characterising differences between self-reported and wastewater-identified drug use at two consecutive years of an Australian music festival. The Science of the Total Environment, 921, 170934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170934.

External website: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/...

BACKGROUND: In the context of drug prohibition, potential adulteration and variable purity pose additional health risks for people who use drugs, with these risks often compounded by the outdoor music festival environment. Ahead of the imminent implementation of drug checking services in Queensland, Australia, this study aims to characterise this problem using triangulated survey and wastewater data to understand self-reported and detected drug use among attendees of a multi-day Queensland-based music festival in 2021 and 2022.

METHODS: We administered an in-situ survey focusing on drug use at the festival to two convenience samples of 136 and 140 festival attendees in 2021 and 2022 respectively. We compared survey findings to wastewater collected concurrently from the festival's site-specific wastewater treatment plant, which was analysed using Liquid Chromatography Tandem Mass Spectrometry.

RESULTS: Most survey respondents (82 % in 2021, 92 % in 2022) reported using or intending to use an illicit drug at the festival. Some respondents reported potentially risky drug use practices such as using drugs found on the ground (2 % in 2021, 4 % in 2022). Substances detected in wastewater but not surveys include MDEA, mephedrone, methylone, 3-MMC, alpha-D2PV, etizolam, eutylone, and N,N-dimethylpentylone.

CONCLUSION: Many substances detected in wastewater but not self-reported in surveys likely represent substitutions or adulterants. These findings highlight the benefits of drug checking services to prevent harms from adulterants and provide education on safer drug use practices. These findings also provide useful information on socio-demographic characteristics and drug use patterns of potential users of Queensland's future drug checking service.


Repository Staff Only: item control page