Home > Mortality from leading cancers in districts of England from 2002 to 2019.

Rashid, Theo and Bennett, James E and Muller, David C and Cross, Amanda J and Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan and Asaria, Perviz and Iyathoo, Hima (2024) Mortality from leading cancers in districts of England from 2002 to 2019. The Lancet Oncology, 25, (1), pp. 86-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00530-2.

External website: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanonc/article/...


Background: Cancers are the leading cause of death in England. We aimed to estimate trends in mortality from leading cancers from 2002 to 2019 for the 314 districts in England.

Methods: We did a high-resolution spatiotemporal analysis of vital registration data from the UK Office for National Statistics using data on all deaths from the ten leading cancers in England from 2002 to 2019. We used a Bayesian hierarchical model to obtain robust estimates of age-specific and cause-specific death rates. We used life table methods to calculate the primary outcome, the unconditional probability of dying between birth and age 80 years by sex, cancer cause of death, local district, and year. We reported Spearman rank correlations between the probability of dying from a cancer and district-level poverty in 2019.

Findings: In 2019, the probability of dying from a cancer before age 80 years ranged from 0·10 (95% credible interval [CrI] 0·10–0·11) to 0·17 (0·16–0·18) for women and from 0·12 (0·12–0·13) to 0·22 (0·21–0·23) for men. Variation in the probability of dying was largest for lung cancer among women, being 3·7 times (95% CrI 3·2–4·4) higher in the district with the highest probability than in the district with the lowest probability; and for stomach cancer for men, being 3·2 times (2·6–4·1) higher in the district with the highest probability than in the one with the lowest probability. The variation in the probability of dying was smallest across districts for lymphoma and multiple myeloma (95% CrI 1·2 times [1·1–1·4] higher in the district with the highest probability than the lowest probability for women and 1·2 times [1·0–1·4] for men), and leukaemia (1·1 times [1·0–1·4] for women and 1·2 times [1·0–1·5] for men). The Spearman rank correlation between probability of dying from a cancer and district poverty was 0·74 (95% CrI 0·72–0·76) for women and 0·79 (0·78–0·81) for men. From 2002 to 2019, the overall probability of dying from a cancer declined in all districts: the reductions ranged from 6·6% (95% CrI 0·3–13·1) to 30·1% (25·6–34·5) for women and from 12·8% (7·1–18·8) to 36·7% (32·2–41·2) for men. However, there were increases in mortality for liver cancer among men, lung cancer and corpus uteri cancer among women, and pancreatic cancer in both sexes in some or all districts with posterior probability greater than 0·80.

Interpretation: Cancers with modifiable risk factors and potential for screening for precancerous lesions had heterogeneous trends and the greatest geographical inequality. To reduce these inequalities, factors affecting both incidence and survival need to be addressed at the local level.

Item Type
Article
Publication Type
International, Open Access, Article
Drug Type
Alcohol, Tobacco / Nicotine
Intervention Type
Harm reduction
Date
2024
Identification #
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00530-2
Page Range
pp. 86-98
Publisher
Elsevier
Volume
25
Number
1
EndNote

Repository Staff Only: item control page