Oliver, Dominic and Englund, Amir and Chesney, Edward and Chester, Lucy and Wilson, Jack and Sovi, Simina and Wigroth, Stina and Hodsoll, John and Strang, John and Murray, Robin M and Freeman, Tom P and Fusar-Poli, Paolo and McGuire, Philip (2024) Cannabidiol does not attenuate acute delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol-induced attentional bias in healthy volunteers: a randomised, double-blind, cross-over study. Addiction, 119, (2), pp. 322-333. doi: 10.1111/add.16353..
External website: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/a...
AIMS: To test how attentional bias and explicit liking are influenced by delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and whether these effects are moderated by cannabidiol (CBD).
DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, within-subjects cross-over study in NIHR Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Facility at King's College Hospital, London, United Kingdom. Participants were forty-six infrequent cannabis users (cannabis use <1 per week).
INTERVENTION(S): Across four sessions, participants inhaled vaporised cannabis containing 10 mg of THC and either 0 mg (0:1 CBD:THC), 10 mg (1:1), 20 mg (2:1) or 30 mg (3:1) of CBD, administered in a randomised order and counter-balanced across participants (a total of 24 order groups).
MEASUREMENTS: Participants completed two tasks: (1) Attentional Bias (AB), comparing reaction times toward visual probes presented behind 28 target stimuli (cannabis/food) compared with probes behind corresponding non-target (neutral) stimuli. Participants responding more quickly to probes behind target than non-target stimuli would indicate greater attentional bias to cannabis/food; (2) Picture Rating (PR), where all AB stimuli were rated on a 7-point pleasantness scale, measuring explicit liking.
FINDINGS: During the AB task, participants were more biased toward cannabis stimuli in the 0:1 condition compared with baseline. No other significant AB or PR differences were found between cannabis and food stimuli between baseline and 0:1 condition (P > 0.05). No significant CBD effect was found on AB or PR task performance at any dose (P > 0.05). There was additionally no cumulative effect of THC exposure on AB or PR outcomes (P > 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: A double-blind, randomised, cross-over study among infrequent cannabis users found that inhaled delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol increased attentional bias toward cannabis in the absence of explicit liking, a marker of liability toward cannabis use disorder. At the concentrations normally found in legal and illegal cannabis, cannabidiol had no influence on this effect.
[See also, related release from King's College London]
B Substances > Cannabis product (Cannabinoids) > Cannabinol / Cannabidiol (CBD oil)
F Concepts in psychology > Attitude > Attitude toward substance use
G Health and disease > Substance use disorder (addiction) > Drug use disorder
J Health care, prevention, harm reduction and treatment > Risk and protective factors > Risk factors
J Health care, prevention, harm reduction and treatment > Risk and needs assessment > Risk assessment
VA Geographic area > Europe > United Kingdom
Repository Staff Only: item control page