Home > Measuring treatment outcomes in gambling disorders: a systematic review.

Pickering, Dylan and Keen, Brittany and Entwistle, Gavin and Blaszczynski, Alex (2018) Measuring treatment outcomes in gambling disorders: a systematic review. Addiction, 113, (3), pp. 411-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13968.

External website: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/add.13...

BACKGROUND AND AIMS Considerable variation of outcome variables used to measure recovery in the gambling treatment literature has precluded effective cross-study evaluations and hindered the development of best-practice treatment methodologies. The aim of this systematic review was to describe current diffuse concepts of recovery in the gambling field by mapping the range of outcomes and measurement strategies used to evaluate treatments, and to identify more commonly accepted indices of recovery.

METHODS A systematic search of six academic databases for studies evaluating treatments (psychological and pharmacological) for gambling disorders with a minimum 6-month follow-up. Data from eligible studies were tabulated and analysis conducted using a narrative approach. Guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) were adhered to.

RESULTS Thirty-four studies were reviewed systematically (RCTs = 17, comparative designs = 17). Sixty-three different outcome measures were identified: 25 (39.7%) assessed gambling-specific constructs, 36 (57.1%) assessed non-gambling specific constructs, and two instruments were used across both categories (3.2%). Self-report instruments ranged from psychometrically validated to ad-hoc author-designed questionnaires. Units of measurement were inconsistent, particularly in the assessment of gambling behaviour. All studies assessed indices of gambling behaviour and/or symptoms of gambling disorder. Almost all studies (n = 30; 88.2%) included secondary measures relating to psychiatric comorbidities, psychological processes linked to treatment approach, or global functioning and wellbeing.

CONCLUSIONS In research on gambling disorders, the incorporation of broader outcome domains that extend beyond disorder-specific symptoms and behaviours suggests a multi-dimensional conceptualization of recovery. Development of a single comprehensive scale to measure all aspects of gambling recovery could help to facilitate uniform reporting practices across the field.


Item Type
Article
Publication Type
International, Open Access, Review
Drug Type
Behavioural addiction
Intervention Type
Harm reduction
Date
2018
Identification #
https://doi.org/10.1111/add.13968
Page Range
pp. 411-426
Publisher
Wiley-Blackwell
Volume
113
Number
3
EndNote

Repository Staff Only: item control page