Home > Probation and mental health: do we really need equivalence?

Brooker, Charlie (2021) Probation and mental health: do we really need equivalence? Irish Probation Journal, 18, pp. 7-27.

[img]
Preview
PDF (Irish Probation Journal issue 18)
1MB

External website: http://www.probation.ie/EN/PB/WebPages/WP16000126


A ‘Zeitgeist’ is defined as ‘the defining spirit or mood of a particular period of history as shown by the ideas and beliefs of the time’, and I am pleased to say I think this is what is currently happening with probation and mental health. For too long, mental health has been the poor relation in probation practice — a situation that seems to be gradually changing. This paper draws from a series of research studies, undertaken locally, nationally and across Europe, to show that we are beginning to understand more and more about probation and the mental health of its clientèle. There are still serious gaps in our research knowledge, for example, about effective interventions, but the last decade has clarified the direction of travel that is required.

The paper questions whether clients with mental health problems in probation require ‘equivalence’. That is, the same services that other members of the general population can access, who live in the community. I argue that the complexity of clients’ presentations does not equate to what is currently available in the community. Thus, new thinking is required, and much more research is needed to examine, for example, the role of assertive-outreach principles and models of service provision — perhaps alongside a sub-group of specialist Probation Staff specifically trained in mental health. There is a long way to travel before we can say that all probation clients are receiving the mental health services they need.

Repository Staff Only: item control page