Skip Page Header

Home > Fetal safety of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Taylor, Lauren and Claire, Ravinder and Campbell, Katarzyna and Coleman-Haynes, Tom and Leonardi-Bee, Jo and Chamberlain, Catherine and Berlin, Ivan and Davey, Mary-Ann and Cooper, Sue and Coleman, Tim . (2020) Fetal safety of nicotine replacement therapy in pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis. Addiction, Early online

URL: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ad...

BACKGROUND AND AIMS
Smoking in pregnancy causes substantial avoidable harm to mothers and offspring; nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) may prevent this and is used to help women quit. A recently updated Cochrane review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) investigating impacts of NRT in pregnancy focuses primarily on efficacy data but also reports adverse impacts from NRT. Here we identify and summarise NRT impacts on adverse pregnancy outcomes reported in non-randomised controlled trials (non-RCTs).

METHODS
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of RCTs and non-RCT studies of NRT in pregnancy, with design-specific risk of bias assessment and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria applied to selected outcomes.

FINDINGS
Relevant Cochrane review findings are reported alongside those from this new review. Seven RCTs were included; N=2340. Nine meta-analyses were performed; non-statistically significant estimates indicated potentially reduced risk from NRT compared with smoking for mean birth weight, low birth weight, preterm birth, intensive care admissions, neonatal death, congenital anomalies and caesarean section and potentially increased risks for miscarriage and stillbirth. GRADE assessment for mean birthweight and miscarriage outcomes indicated 'low' confidence in findings. Twenty-three non-RCTs were included; N=931163. 11 large studies from 5 routine healthcare cohorts reported clinical outcomes; 12 small studies investigated mainly physiological outcomes within in-patient women given NRT. Findings from meta-analyses for congenital anomalies, stillbirth and preterm birth were underpowered and not in a consistent direction; GRADE assessment of confidence in findings was 'very low'. Routine healthcare studies were higher quality, but implications of reported findings were unclear as there was inadequate measurement and reporting of women's smoking.

CONCLUSIONS
Available evidence from randomised controlled trials and non-randomised comparative studies does not currently provide clear evidence as to whether maternal use of nicotine replacement therapy during pregnancy is harmful to the fetus.


Item Type
Evidence resource
Publication Type
Review
Drug Type
Tobacco
Intervention Type
AOD disorder harm reduction
Date
4 July 2020
Volume
Early online
EndNote
Accession Number
HRB (Electronic Only)

Repository Staff Only: item control page