by Emily Crick
Abstract:
The stated intention behind the establishment of the global drug prohibition regime was to protect the world from the dangers of drugs. At different points in history, drug production, use and supply have all been presented as threats to security whether human, national or international security. The international relations theory of securitization can be used as a way of explaining how and why the ‘drugs as an existential threat’ discourse holds so much power, even today. Speech acts such as the \UN\ Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the \UN\ Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Russia's ‘Rainbow-2 Plan’ clearly illustrate the development of the ‘drugs as an existential threat’ discourse at a global level with particular reference to mankind, the State and global peace and security, respectively. Analysis of these speech acts also shows how the power of the security narrative means that the global drug prohibition regime continues to remain pre-eminent despite the wealth of unintended consequences that it causes.
Reference:
Drugs as an existential threat: An analysis of the international securitization of drugs (Emily Crick), In International Journal of Drug Policy, volume 23, no. 5, 2012.AbstractThe stated intention behind the establishment of the global drug prohibition regime was to protect the world from the dangers of drugs. At different points in history, drug production, use and supply have all been presented as threats to security whether human, national or international security. The international relations theory of securitization can be used as a way of explaining how and why the ‘drugs as an existential threat’ discourse holds so much power, even today. Speech acts such as the \UN\ Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the \UN\ Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Russia's ‘Rainbow-2 Plan’ clearly illustrate the development of the ‘drugs as an existential threat’ discourse at a global level with particular reference to mankind, the State and global peace and security, respectively. Analysis of these speech acts also shows how the power of the security narrative means that the global drug prohibition regime continues to remain pre-eminent despite the wealth of unintended consequences that it causes.KeywordsSecurity ()
Bibtex Entry:
@article{Crick2012407,
title = "Drugs as an existential threat: An analysis of the international securitization of drugs ",
journal = "International Journal of Drug Policy ",
volume = "23",
number = "5",
pages = "407 - 414",
year = "2012",
note = "",
issn = "0955-3959",
doi = "10.1016/j.drugpo.2012.03.004",
url = "http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395912000503",
author = "Emily Crick",
keywords = "Drug prohibition",
keywords = "Illicit drugs",
keywords = "‘War on Drugs’",
keywords = "Securitization",
keywords = "Security ",
abstract = "The stated intention behind the establishment of the global drug prohibition regime was to protect the world from the dangers of drugs. At different points in history, drug production, use and supply have all been presented as threats to security whether human, national or international security. The international relations theory of securitization can be used as a way of explaining how and why the ‘drugs as an existential threat’ discourse holds so much power, even today. Speech acts such as the \{UN\} Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs, the \{UN\} Convention Against Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances and Russia's ‘Rainbow-2 Plan’ clearly illustrate the development of the ‘drugs as an existential threat’ discourse at a global level with particular reference to mankind, the State and global peace and security, respectively. Analysis of these speech acts also shows how the power of the security narrative means that the global drug prohibition regime continues to remain pre-eminent despite the wealth of unintended consequences that it causes. "
}